So one day (today), my exams finished themselves up and suddenly, I had a lot of spare time. So decided to actually take up an argument I remember having with *eyyyewww… boyzz*, when we were itty bitty. Lets start with the story that sowed this seed of thought into my good friend, the SewageMessiah's brain.
RELIGION:
Can't argue with the Sewage Messiah about this one. Religion would perish without men to keep up all the brahuahua. And so would a whole ideological state apparatus designed to seal the mind of the layperson (notice I said "person"?) off the natural human tendency to question the norm and pursue the higher truth. Good riddance.
SCIENCE:
I will pull my argument out of His own gracious words,
"for centuries women were barred entry to the sciences, therefore it will take a few generations before women reach the same level of scientific aptitude as men". As for direction and expertise, women are already working on that, what with statistics indicating that more and more women are opting to be engineers and scientists, including, surprise surprise, geneticists (yours truly) and astronauts (remember Chawla? But of course, you know there've been many more space-women before and since). So we're already preparing for a possible "man-ocide" situation.
Its true, if all the men vanished, the most missed would be the handymen. But wait! We'd still have the greatest scientific and technological legacy men ever left behind- The User Manual. Women will learn how to fix a bulb eventually. Of course, its not in our nature to do so, but hey, neither was domestic work and we managed to do that just fine for a really long time because of a real situation, similar to the would-be situation of "no-man"...if we don't do it, nobody will.
THE ARTS:
Women couldn't paint because they were cooking.
Women couldn't compose music because they were cooking.
Women couldn't cook because they were cooking?
Well yes. All the poor-to-middle class women of the world have been cooking for a really long time. And there's more.
But before that, what about the bourgeoisie women across the world? Now that's just absurd. They certainly weren't cooking.
So lets think about the fine English Ladies who sat in fine houses adorned with fine Van Gogh works of art. Now think about bejeweled Indian princesses in their Hawa Mahals. Or the Arabian chieftain's veiled daughter far removed from the reach of the evil eye. Or say, the young French women who often posed for these great works of art. What were these lazy women doing, wasting their time, giving themselves airs, not getting an education? WOAH! Did I say EDUCATION? Did I? Did I? O my god! What do the poor women, the middle class women and the rich aristocratic women have in common by shared deprivation? An Education! So the poor and middle class women were taught to cook and look after babies, while the aristocratic women of the world were taught rubbish things like etiquette, ceramic painting and bricolage. Of course, they were also taught how to be an ideal wife and mother.
SEX: I don't think women would turn to beasts. But this part is mostly right.
If you wanna know what a world without women would be like, there are other places to look toward. Like a prison, for instance. Monasteries also. Generally, sweeping generalizations are my pet peeve.
4 comments :
hey babe
exams over! yay! how was the last?
and was the 'argument' you had with tp? a world of women would bore to death.
Helloness..last exam was easy as pie.
Yea... i think its a debate. I think a world without women would blow....just as bad as a world without men.
hahaha...=) i like
*grin*
Post a Comment